Home / Directory / Fee billing

Fee billing: a buyer's guide

What we list in this category, how the field splits between long-established products and newer ones, and the questions worth pressing on before you commit.

Every entry below was recorded from a page we opened, and each carries the source we read. Where we could not establish something it is left blank rather than guessed. Read how this site works if you want the detail.

Long-established products

Recorded as established: in production for many years, usually with a deep reference base and broad coverage. Those are real advantages, and so is the fact that a fifteen-year horizon is easier to argue for a supplier that has already lasted one.

• FirmView — Carry, co-investment and compensation management with waterfall and carry distribution for private funds; Allvue's site states the product came with its acquisition of PFA Solutions. source
• First Rate — Performance measurement, attribution, GIPS composites and client reporting for banks and wealth managers; the site names sub-brands First Rate Ventures, Vantage and Finantech but not a single product name for the core performance engine. source
• Meritsoft Asset Servicing Claims Management — Post-trade automation for the money side of corporate actions, including asset servicing claims, interest claims, transaction tax and CSDR penalties. source
• Meritsoft Trade Tracking and Exception Management — Rules-based automation for settlement fails and exceptions, CSDR penalties, interest and asset servicing claims, and trade-related fees and taxes. source
• Optimize Spend — Enterprise expense management for market data, research and subscription spend, tracking over $10 billion of subscription cost for financial institutions. source
• Orion Portfolio Accounting (billing) — Advisory fee billing runs inside Orion's portfolio accounting product alongside performance reporting and trading. source
• Revenue Manager — Enterprise revenue and fee billing engine for asset managers with a rules engine for negotiated and tiered fee terms, multi-currency calculation and general ledger integration. source
• Revport — Cloud fee billing platform that calculates, validates, accrues, invoices and reconciles management, performance, advisory and custodial fees for institutional asset and wealth managers. source

Newer products

Recorded as modern or emerging. Newer suppliers often offer capability and pricing the incumbents do not, and they carry risks the incumbents do not: fewer references at your size, less operating history, and concentration if they are small. Both belong in the same comparison, on the same fields.

• Altruist — Self-clearing custodian built on its own software, bundling custody with account opening, trading, portfolio reporting and fee billing for independent advisory firms. source
• BluePrint Fee Billing — Fee billing delivered as software plus outsourced service on STP's BluePrint operations platform for RIAs, alternative managers and private fund advisers. source
• Ceviche — Automates fund expense allocation across multi-entity fund structures according to LPA rules and writes audit-ready journal entries into the general ledger. source
• FAIR (Fee Allocation Incentive Reporting) — Independent validation of the management fees, partnership expenses and carried interest that LPs are charged by private fund managers; colmore.com now redirects to BlackRock's eFront Insight page, so the service appears to have been folded into eFront and I could not confirm its current owner or product name. source
• Juniper Square Fund Administration — Fund accounting, treasury and waterfall modeling across the private fund lifecycle, covering fee and distribution calculations for GPs. source
• LemonEdge — Private markets accounting engine with event-driven transactions, multi-ledger allocation paths and embedded waterfalls; raised a $21M Series A led by Blackstone with BNY in July 2026. source
• Maybern — Private fund operating system that configures custom fee bases and fee breaks to calculate management fees, and runs waterfalls, carry and capital calls; raised a $50M Series B and $76M in total per Forbes. source
• Opterra — Post-trade and investment operations platform covering unified accounting, allocations, reconciliations and treasury; paired with Limina for front-to-back. source

What to ask

These come from the same question bank our request-for-proposal process uses, so a guide and an RFP never drift apart. The four sections below carry the most weight in that bank.

Functional fit

Whether the system does the job for YOUR instruments, markets and volumes — not for the demonstration portfolio. The questions separate what runs in production today from what is on the roadmap, because that distinction disappears in a sales meeting and reappears during implementation. It also asks what still has to be typed in by hand, which every system has and few volunteer.

• Which asset classes does the product support in production today?
• Is there a full audit trail of who changed what and when, and can it be exported?
• Does the system enforce segregation of duties between front and back office?
• Is maker-checker approval supported on material actions, and is it configurable by action type?
• Can a valuation be sourced and approved independently of the people who trade?

Security and resilience

Whether the vendor's security is independently attested or merely asserted. The questions ask for certifications you can read, penetration tests you can see the summary of, and recovery objectives that are written down. Incident history is asked directly, because a vendor that has handled a breach well is often a safer choice than one that has never been tested.

• Which independent attestations do you hold currently?
• Will you provide the most recent report under a non-disclosure agreement?
• Is data encrypted in transit and at rest?
• Is single sign-on supported, and is multi-factor authentication enforced?
• Can your own staff see our data, and is that access logged and reviewable by us?

Commercial terms

Total cost across the whole term, and what happens if you leave. Year one is asked separately from years two to five because year one hides where the money goes. The section asks explicitly what is NOT included, since the gap between the quote and the invoice lives there, and it asks about exit terms while you still have the leverage to negotiate them.

• How is the product priced?
• What is the total first-year cost for our stated requirement, including implementation?
• What is the total annual cost in years two through five?
• What is NOT included in that figure?
• Is there a contractual cap on annual price increases?

Artificial intelligence

If a model touches your data, on what terms. This section exists because the answers differ enormously between vendors and are rarely offered unprompted. It asks whether your data trains models serving other clients, whether you can opt out and keep full function, whether a human reviews output before it affects a book or a client report, and who is liable when a model is wrong. Skip it only if you genuinely do not care.

• Does the product use machine learning or generative AI anywhere in its normal operation?
• Is client data ever used to train models that serve other clients?
• Can we opt out of AI features entirely and keep full product function?
• Does our data leave your infrastructure to reach those providers?
• Is a human review step required before an AI output affects a book, a trade or a client report?

See all 28 products in Fee billing · Glossary