Home / Directory / Regulatory compliance
Regulatory compliance: a buyer's guide
What we list in this category, where each entry came from, and the questions worth pressing on before you commit.
Every entry below was recorded from a page we opened, and each carries the source we read. Where we could not establish something it is left blank rather than guessed. Read how this site works if you want the detail.
What we list
Every product we hold in this category, in one list. A supplier that has run in production for twenty years and one that launched last year appear together and carry the same fields, because that is the comparison a buyer has to make. Each entry's founding year and owner are on its company page where the company states them, and both bear on continuity: long service is evidence a supplier will still be there, and a young supplier may offer capability and pricing the incumbents do not while carrying fewer references at your size.
- ACA Group — Compliance advisory, managed services and regulatory authorisation support — Builds the compliance side of a launch, including FCA authorisation and ongoing compliance operations, regulatory filings and surveillance technology. source
- FE fundinfo Factsheets — Fund factsheets and automated PRIIPs, UCITS, SFDR and TCFD document production, with dissemination to platforms and distributors. source
- Financial Crime Compliance Services — Collects investor documents and screens them for KYC and AML, run as a managed service for investment advisers rather than as software alone. source
- Gen II Compliance Services — Outsourced compliance for private capital funds: investor AML/KYC (powered by Fenergo), beneficial ownership registers and ongoing risk-based monitoring run by MLRO and MLCO professionals, alongside regulatory filings. source
- Greenboard — Compliance system for SEC and FINRA workflows covering communications archiving, marketing review, firm compliance and employee supervision for RIAs, hedge funds and private funds. source
- HALO — Trade surveillance, transaction monitoring and execution quality built first for digital assets and now sold into traditional finance. source
- Hadrius — Y Combinator-backed compliance system of record for RIAs, broker-dealers and private funds: comms supervision, marketing review, trade and personal-trading oversight. source
- Juniper Square AML/KYC — AML/KYC compliance for private markets GPs across US and Cayman funds: AI-assisted screening of every investor on deterministic rules, with compliance experts behind each decision and a full audit trail. source
- Kneip — Fund data management, document dissemination and regulatory reporting for asset managers; became part of Clearstream and Deutsche Börse Group in 2022. source
- MCO KYC & AML Compliance — KYC and AML compliance on the MCO platform: customer due diligence, third-party screening and AML transaction screening, with ongoing monitoring of risk. source
- MX.3 for Collateral Management — Module of the MX.3 platform running variation and initial margin through settlement, with cheapest-to-deliver collateral allocation and a real-time global inventory. source
- MyComplianceOffice — Compliance platform covering employee personal trading, gifts and political contributions, electronic communications archive and review, trade surveillance, insider and MNPI control, and third-party risk. source
- NICE Actimize Anti-Money Laundering — Anti-money-laundering suite covering suspicious activity monitoring, KYC, sanctions screening, entity risk scoring, and suspicious and currency transaction reporting, using machine learning. source
- Norm Ai — AI agents that encode legal and regulatory rules to automate compliance review tasks for financial institutions, including asset managers. source
- Numerix Enterprise Risk Management — Derivatives-heavy market risk, counterparty credit risk and model validation built on the Numerix analytics library. source
- Parallel Markets — Investor onboarding and compliance software for funds, banks and other financial institutions. source
- Red Oak — Compliance software for RIAs and broker-dealers covering advertising review and communications surveillance. source
- Reporting as a Service — Cloud reporting service producing client, fund and regulatory reports, fund factsheets and KIIDs/KIDs for asset and wealth managers. source
- SaifrScreen — AML/KYC screening and continuous monitoring of customers and vendors, with adverse media screening and sanctions monitoring alerts drawn from unstructured internet data and risk lists. source
- SanctionsKit — Screens customers and suppliers against OFAC and other sanctions lists through an API and a dashboard, with match review, case management and ongoing monitoring. source
- StarCompliance — Employee compliance software covering personal account dealing, conflicts of interest, gifts, outside activities and MNPI control rooms. source
- TIS Platform — Cloud payments hub with cash visibility, AI-assisted forecasting and sanctions/fraud screening across 11,000+ bank connections. source
- Vestlane — Investor onboarding with KYC/AML, digital fundraising and fund operations for private funds, with an investor wallet for repeat LPs. source
- Waystone Compliance Solutions — Outsourced compliance services for asset managers, including SEC registration and Form ADV filing, mock regulatory exams, AML/KYC and outsourced compliance roles. source
What to ask
These come from the same question bank our request-for-proposal process uses, so a guide and an RFP never drift apart. The four sections below carry the most weight in that bank.
Functional fit
Whether the system does the job for YOUR instruments, markets and volumes — not for the demonstration portfolio. The questions separate what runs in production today from what is on the roadmap, because that distinction disappears in a sales meeting and reappears during implementation. It also asks what still has to be typed in by hand, which every system has and few volunteer.
- Which asset classes does the product support in production today?
- Is there a full audit trail of who changed what and when, and can it be exported?
- Does the system enforce segregation of duties between front and back office?
- Is maker-checker approval supported on material actions, and is it configurable by action type?
- Can a valuation be sourced and approved independently of the people who trade?
Security and resilience
Whether the vendor's security is independently attested or merely asserted. The questions ask for certifications you can read, penetration tests you can see the summary of, and recovery objectives that are written down. Incident history is asked directly, because a vendor that has handled a breach well is often a safer choice than one that has never been tested.
- Which independent attestations do you hold currently?
- Will you provide the most recent report under a non-disclosure agreement?
- Is data encrypted in transit and at rest?
- Is single sign-on supported, and is multi-factor authentication enforced?
- Can your own staff see our data, and is that access logged and reviewable by us?
Compliance and regulatory
Whether the system stands up to your regulator and your auditor. Covers the reporting regimes the product supports directly, whether it can evidence who saw or changed a record, how long records are retained, and where in the world your data physically sits — which is a hard constraint for many firms rather than a preference.
- Can the system evidence to an auditor who saw or changed a given record, and when?
- In which jurisdictions is our data stored and processed?
- Are there any pending criminal matters or debarment proceedings involving the firm, its officers or its managers?
- Which regulatory reporting regimes does the product support directly?
- When a regime changes, is the update included in the licence or charged separately?
Clients and references
Whether they have done this for a firm like yours, and whether those firms stayed. Vendors present client counts and logos readily; they present ATTRITION reluctantly, which is why this section asks for clients lost and migrations completed as separate questions from clients won. Size fit decides more failed implementations than feature lists do, so it is asked directly.
- How many client firms use this product in production today?
- How many of those are of a similar type to our firm?
- How many are within our assets-under-management band?
- How many clients did you LOSE in each of the last three years?
- How many implementations begun in the last three years were abandoned before go-live?
You can send all 167 of these questions to the vendors you choose, and get every answer back side by side. Run an RFP — it is free to you and free to them.