Home · Guides

How to run a vendor search

A practical guide for someone doing this for the first time: how to work out what you actually need, how to build a shortlist that is not just the three vendors you have heard of, and how to avoid the mistakes that make a selection take a year and end badly.

Editorial — Buyside Fintech's guidance

Before you look at any vendor

The most common way a selection goes wrong is starting with products. You end up comparing feature lists, every vendor has every feature, and the decision falls to whoever demonstrated best. Start instead with these four questions, and write the answers down where the whole team can see them.

  1. What breaks today? Be specific. "Reconciliation is painful" is not a requirement. "Two people spend every morning until 11am clearing breaks between the administrator and our book, and month-end takes four days" is.
  2. What must be true in three years? A system chosen for the firm you are now will be replaced by the firm you become. If you plan to add a strategy, a jurisdiction or an asset class, that belongs in the requirement now.
  3. What will you not compromise on? Usually two or three things. Everything else is negotiable, and knowing which is which before you see a demonstration is what stops you being sold.
  4. Who has to live with it? Name them. The people who will use the system daily should be in the room for the demonstrations, not shown the result.

Work out which category you are actually buying

This sounds trivial and frequently is not. Order management and execution management are different systems; portfolio accounting and fund accounting answer different questions; a fund administrator is a service and fund accounting software is a product. Buying the wrong category wastes a quarter.

The category reference defines each of the 41 categories and states, for each, what it is most often confused with. Read the one you think you need and the one it warns you about.

Expect overlap. The average product in this directory spans 2.6 categories. A shortlist for a narrow requirement will contain broad platforms, and that is not noise — they genuinely do the narrow thing too. The question is whether you want the rest of it.

Build a long list, then cut it

Aim for eight to fifteen names before you cut to a shortlist. Fewer than that and you are choosing between the vendors you already knew, which is how firms end up with the market leader they never tested.

Then cut to four to six on hard criteria only — asset class coverage, deployment model, jurisdiction, whether they serve firms your size. Do not cut on impressions.

Ask everyone the same questions

The single highest-value thing you can do is put the same written questions to every shortlisted vendor, and get the answers in writing before you see a demonstration. Written answers are comparable, attributable and hard to walk back. Demonstrations are not.

Our annotated question set explains what each question establishes and what a weak answer looks like. You can also run the whole process here, which sends one brief to the vendors you pick and returns the answers side by side.

Run the demonstrations properly

Check references, and check the ones you were not given

Every vendor will supply three delighted clients. Speak to them, and then find someone the vendor did not nominate — through peers, your administrator, or a user group. Ask all of them three questions:

  1. What did implementation actually cost, in time and in your people, against what you were told?
  2. What do you know now that you wish you had asked?
  3. Would you buy it again?

Before you sign

What this guide is. It is our editorial view, drawn from how these selections are commonly run and commonly go wrong. It is not advice about your firm, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy any product. Your own procurement rules and regulatory obligations come first.